Research Projects

CIRCUMSTANTIAL LIBERALS:

Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy

accepted for publication by Oxford University Press

Ethnic minorities make contemporary Europe increasingly diverse. The prevailing wisdom in research on ethnic politics is that ethnicity is a trouble-maker disrupting programmatic politics -- it tends to prioritize group identity over ideology, polity over policy, principle over compromise. In short, ethnicity is expected to be a source of particularistic tension. This book takes a theoretical step back. Approaching ethnic politics as a component of normal politics, it investigates the ideological potential of ethnicity, and examines the conditions that determine the formation of diverse preferences and behavior among ethnic minorities and their representatives. The book seeks to answer central questions: What are the political preferences of ethnic minorities and their representatives? How are ethnic preferences translated into political representation, how does this representation shape political competition, and with what systemic effects?

The book proceeds from the expectation that ethnic minorities seek group preservation. While group preservation is best ensured via self-government, the possibility of attaining self-government is uncertain. Ethnic minorities with higher chances of self-government see themselves as provisional minorities, and are likely to strive for separation, irredenta, or asymmetric rights. Most ethnic minorities, however, face low chances of achieving self-government, and, consequently, they remain as permanent minorities in societies dominated by other groups. This book hypothesizes that permanent minorities in the search for group preservation champion rights and liberties protecting them form the tyranny of the majority. This translates into broader ideological preferences and political behavior, inducing the formation of liberal political poles on the one hand, and illiberal opposition on the other. This dynamic is system forming, as it configures political cleavages, shapes party systems, and informs the absorption of new political issues. Ultimately, the presence of ethnic minorities can be a force for liberal democracy. Simultaneously, conditional factors cross-pressure ethnic minority search for rights and liberties, potentially attenuating ethnic liberalism and inducing exclusionary particularism. The book thus argues that ethnic minorities and their representatives are circumstantial liberals.

The book combines the study of ethnic politics with research on electoral behavior and party competition, while studying both minorities in eastern Europe in comparison with dominant majorities. The book utilizes existing data, and collects new evidence, which it analyses using mixed experimental, quantitative, and qualitative methods. Its empirical chapters are divided into two parts, one focusing on large-N comparative analyses, and one carrying out three in-depth case studies on interwar Czechoslovakia, and contemporary Slovakia and Estonia.

This project develops my earlier work on eastern European party competition:

Communism, Federalism and Ethnic Minorities. 2014. World Politics.

One, historical, chapter on the Germans in interwar Czechoslovakia has been published as a working paper

A component of this research project has been published as a journal article: Antidote to Backsliding: Ethnic Politics and Democratic Resilience 

This research is supported by the POLMIN project financed by Sciences Po. (Slovensky, Magyar, Eesti, на русском, česky)

CZ, FR, PL, RO, SK

AUTHLIB

Liberal democracy faces not one, but many challenges. Consequently, AUTHLIB carefully and systematically explores the varieties of illiberalism. Illiberalism has diverse ways of appealing to elites and to highly varied citizens, through narratives, programs and policies, emotional appeals, and institutional innovations, and it has developed methods of diffusion, each of which needs to be understood and mapped. In line with the varieties of illiberalism and their diverse diffusion channels the policies to mitigate and combat them need to be appropriate to the nature of the challenge in a given context. AUTHLIB provides a toolkit for policy making to defend and enhance liberal democracy against its political challengers by understanding and explaining the nature of illiberal ideologies, processes and policies. The toolkit - consisting of case-specific sets of tools - will consist of theoretically, normatively, and empirically grounded ways of responding to the specifics of illiberal claims against liberal democracy. To achieve these goals, a thorough comparative understanding of the varieties of illiberalism and a toolkit providing responses to illiberalism to strengthen the resilience of liberal democracy, AUTHLIB addresses two overarching objectives: 1) a map of varieties of illiberalism and citizen responses, and 2) the design and testing of interventions. For more information see here.

Papers in Progress

• ``Deciding in Difficult Democracies: Evidence from Presidential Elections in Eastern Europe" (with Filip Kostelka and Lenka Rovna)

• ``Voter Turnout and Satisfaction with Democracy in the Post-Communist Context" (with Filip Kostelka, Lukas Linek and Michal Škvrňák)

• ``Voters' Latent Preferences and Support for Real Candidates: Insights from Czech Elections" (with Filip Kostelka, Eva Krejčová, Lukas Linek and Michal Škvrňák)

• ``European Integration and the Populist Challenge" (with Jonathan Polk)

• ``The Russian Threat and the Consolidation of the West: How Populism and EU-skepticism Shape Support for Ukraine" (with Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Ryan Bakker, Seth Jolly, Jonathan Polk, Marco Steenbergen and Milada Anna Vachudova)